adsens

Exhaust pressure analysis

 Exhaust pressure analysis

This solution involves using a pressure sensor in

exhaust manifold combined with a Fourier analysis as the first stage of the signal processing. Using a sensor to analyse the gas pulses in the exhaustanifold, it is possible to detect single misfires.

It is also possible to identify which cylinder is misfiring. This method is less intrusive than the above and could potentially be retrofitted at the production stage. A sensor in the exhaust can detect misfiring cylinders but cannot give useful, qualitative information about the combustion process. This technique has been demonstrated as capable of detecting all misfires at engine speeds up to 6000 rpm, for all engine configurations, loads, and fuels. Generally, a ceramic capacitive type sensor is been employed which has a short response time and good durability.

5.4.9 Testing vehicles for compliance

The manufacturer must demonstrate the correct function of the system to the appropriate authority.

For EOBD compliance this requires three com-

plete emission cycle runs (NEDC). This is known

as a demonstration test.

A faulty component is installed or simulated

which causes a violation of the emission limits;

two preconditioning cycles are run and then one

complete cycle to show that the error has been

recorded and highlighted via illumination of the

MIL. These phases are defined in EOBD legisla-

tion as:

● simulation of malfunction of a component of

the engine management or emission control

system;

● preconditioning of the vehicle with a simu-

lated malfunction;

● driving the vehicle with a simulated malfunc-

tion over the type 1 test cycle (NEDC) and

measuring the emissions of the vehicle;

● determining whether the OBD system reacts

to the simulated malfunction and indicates

malfunction in an appropriate manner to the

vehicle driver.

Typical failure modes induced to be detected are:

● Petrol/Gasoline Engines

– Replacement of the catalyst with a deteri-

orated or defective catalyst or electronic

simulation of such a failure

– Engine misfire conditions according to the

conditions for misfire monitoring given in

– Replacement of the oxygen sensor with a

deteriorated or defective oxygen sensor or

electronic simulation of such a failure

– Electrical disconnection of any other emis-

sion-related component connected to a pow-

ertrain management computer

– Electrical disconnection of the electronic

evaporative purge control device (if

equipped). For this specific failure mode,

the type 1 test must not be performed

● Diesel Engines

– Where fitted, replacement of the catalyst

with a deteriorated or defective catalyst or

electronic simulation of this condition

– Where fitted, total removal of the particu-

late trap or, where sensors are an integral

part of the trap, a defective trap assembly

– Electrical disconnection of any fuelling

system electronic fuel quantity and timing

actuator

– Electrical disconnection of any other emis-

sion related component connected to a power-

train management computer

Conditioning Run After Fault

Rectification

If an error has occurred with a component and

this error has been recorded by the OBD system,

then (after the problem has been rectified) it is

necessary to clear the fault code memory and test

or condition the vehicle to ensure that:

● the fault has really been fixed and does not

reoccur;

● the system is set up ready for correct future

detection of any faults.

This can be done by putting the vehicle through

drive cycle. A typical manufacturer defined drive

cycle would consist of the following.

1. A cold start (coolant temperature less than

50°C, coolant and air temp within 11°C of

each other).

2. Switch on ignition to allow oxygen sensor

heating and diagnostics.

3. Idle engine for 2 minutes with typical elect-

rical loads on (air conditioning and rear screen

heater).

4. Turn off loads and accelerate to cruise at 

half throttle. The OBD system will check for

misfire, fuel trim and EVAP (canister purge)

systems.

5. Hold speed steady at cruise for 3 minutes. The

OBD system monitors EGR, secondary air

system, oxygen sensors and EVAP system.

6. Overrun/coast down to low speed (i.e. 20 mph)

without using the brake or clutch. The OBD

systems check EGR and EVAP systems.

7. Accelerate back up to cruise for 5 minutes at

three quarter throttle. OBD checks misfire,

fuel trim and EVAP.

8. Hold steady speed of cruise for 5 minutes.

OBD monitors catalytic converter efficiency,

misfire, fuel trim, oxygen sensors and EVAP

systems.

9. Slow down to a stop without braking, OBD

checks EGR and EVAP.

The system is now fully reset and ready for detec-

tion of new faults. The necessary drive cycle to

guarantee reset of the whole system is manufac-

turer specific and should be checked appropriately.

Roadside test

An official in-service OBD2 emission test, as car-

ried out in the USA by inspectors from the regu-

latory authority, consists of the following three

parts (a likely European development therefore).

1. Check MIL function at ignition switch on.

2. Plug in OBD scanner, check monitor readi-

ness. If monitors are not all showing as ready,

the vehicle is rejected and further road testing

is to be done in order to activate all the readi-

ness flags. At this stage the scanner will also

download any fault codes that are present.

3. An additional test, scanner command illumin-

ation of MIL via ECU to verify the correct

function of the OBD system.


 Testing vehicles for 

compliance

The manufacturer must demonstrate the correct

function of the system to the appropriate authority.

For EOBD compliance this requires three com-

plete emission cycle runs (NEDC). This is known

as a demonstration test.

A faulty component is installed or simulated

which causes a violation of the emission limits;

two preconditioning cycles are run and then one

complete cycle to show that the error has been

recorded and highlighted via illumination of the

MIL. These phases are defined in EOBD legisla-

tion as:

● simulation of malfunction of a component of

the engine management or emission control

system;

● preconditioning of the vehicle with a simu-

lated malfunction;

● driving the vehicle with a simulated malfunc-

tion over the type 1 test cycle (NEDC) and

measuring the emissions of the vehicle;

● determining whether the OBD system reacts

to the simulated malfunction and indicates

malfunction in an appropriate manner to the

vehicle driver.

Typical failure modes induced to be detected are:

● Petrol/Gasoline Engines

– Replacement of the catalyst with a deteri-

orated or defective catalyst or electronic

simulation of such a failure

JET PUMP THEORY

 

RICHARD G. CUNNINGHAM

4.3

INTRODUCTION______________________________________________________

The jet pump transfers energy from a liquid or gas primary fluid to a secondary fluid.

The latter may be a liquid, a gas, a two-phase gas-in-liquid mixture, or solid particles transported in a gas or a liquid. Examples of all these combinations have been reported in the technical literature. Reference 1, the major bibliography in this field, contains over 400 abstracts. Although the terms “ejector” and “eductor” are also applied, the term "jet pump” will be used here. The jet pump offers significant advantages over mechanical pumps: no moving parts for improved reliability, adaptability to installation in remote or hazardous environments, simplicity, and low cost. The primary drawback is efficiency: both frictional losses and unavoidable mixing losses are incurred. Neverthe-less, careful design can produce pumps with efficiencies on the order of 30—40%. The jet pump in Figure 1 is typical of liquid-jet pumps and low Mach-number gas-jet/gas pumps.

Compressible-flow pumps, for example, steam-jet ejectors, employ converging-diverging nozzles for full expansion of the jet.

LIQUID-JET PUMP THEORY FOR THREE SECONDARY-FLOW TYPES _________

The liquid-jet pump model is based on conservation equations for energy, momentum, and mass. Real-fluid losses are accounted for by friction-loss coefficients (K). The primary or motive fluid is a liquid of density r1. In the following derivation, the secondary/pumped fluid can be a second liquid of density r1 or r2, or a gas-in-liquid bubbly mixture, or a gas. These

three jet pump flow regimes are referred to as liquid-jet liquid (LJL), liquid-jet gas liquid

(LJGL), and liquid-jet gas (LJG). Equations (1), (3), (5), and (7) below apply to all three.

Assumptions:

a. The primary and secondary streams enter the mixing throat with uniform velocity

distributions, and the mixed flows leave the throat and diffuser with a uniform velocity profile.

b. The gas phase—if present—undergoes isothermal compression in the throat and diffuser.

c. All two-phase flows at the throat entry and exit consist of homogeneous bubble mixtures of a gas in a continuous liquid.

d. Heat transfer from the gas to the liquid is negligible—the liquid temperature remains constant.

e. Change in solubility of the gas in the liquid from pressure Ps to Pd is negligible.

f. Vapor evolution from and condensation to the liquid are negligibly small.