adsens

Programmed ignition

 Programmed ignition

Programmed ignition is the term used by some

manufacturers; others call it electronic spark

advance (ESA). Constant energy electronic igni-

tion was a major step forwards and is still used

on countless applications. However, its limita-

tions lay in still having to rely upon mechanical

components for speed and load advance characteristics. In many cases these did not match ideally the requirements of the engine.

Programmed ignition systems have a major

difference compared to earlier systems in that

they operate digitally. Information about the operating requirements of a particular engine is programmed in to memory inside the ECU. The datafor storage in ROM is obtained from rigorous testing on an engine dynamometer and further development work in the vehicle under variousoperating conditions. Programmed ignition hasseveral advantages.

● The ignition timing can be accurately matched to the individual application under a range of operating conditions.

● Other control input can be utilised such as coolant temperature and ambient air

temperature.

● Starting is improved, fuel consumption is

reduced as are emissions and idle control is

better.

● Other inputs can be taken into account such as engine knock.

● The number of wearing components in the

ignition system is considerably reduced.

Programmed ignition or ESA can be a separate

system or included as part of the fuel control system. In order for the ECU to calculate suitable timing and dwell outputs, certain input information is required.

The crankshaft sensor consists of a permanent

magnet, a winding and a soft iron core. It is

mounted in proximity to a reluctor disc. The disc

has 34 teeth spaced at 10° intervals around to

periphery. It has two teeth missing 180° apart, at

a known position BTDC. Many manufacturers

use this technique with minor differences. As a

tooth from the reluctor disc passes the core of the densor the reluctance of the magnetic circuit is changed. This induces a voltage in the winding, the frequency of the waveform being proportional to the engine speed. The missing tooth causes a 'missed’ output wave and hence engine position can be determined.

Engine load is proportional to manifold pres-

sure in that high load conditions produce high

pressure and lower load conditions, such as cruise, produce lower pressure. Load sensors are there fore pressure transducers. They are either mounted in the ECU or as a separate unit and are condected to the inlet manifold with a pipe. The pipe often incorporates a restriction to damp out fluctuations and a vapour trap to prevent petrol fumes reaching the sensor.

Coolant temperature measurement is carried

out by a simple thermistor. In many cases the

same sensor is used for the operation of the temperature gauge and to provide information to the fuel control system. A separate memory map is used to correct the basic timing settings. Timing may be retarded when the engine is cold to assist in more rapid warm up.

Combustion knock can cause serious damage to an engine if sustained for long periods. This knock or detonation is caused by over advanced ignition timing. At variance with this is that an engine in general will run at its most efficient when the timing is advanced as far as possible. To achieve this the data stored in the basic timing map will be as close to the knock limit of the engine as possible.

The knock sensor provides a margin for error. The sensor itself is an accelerometer often of the piezoelectric type. It is fitted in the engine block between cylinders two and three on in-line four cylinder engines. Vee engine’s require two sensors, one on each side. The ECU responds to signals from the knock sensor in the engine’s knock window for each cylinder; this is often just a few degrees each side of TDC. This prevents clatter from the valve mechanism being interpreted as knock. The signal from the sensor is also filtered in the ECU to remove unwanted noise. If detonation is detected the ignition timing is retarded on the fourth ignition pulse after detection (four cylinder engine), in steps until knock is no longer detected. The steps vary between manufacturers but about 2° is typical. The timing is then advanced slowly in steps of say 1° over a number of engine revolutions, until the advance required by memory is restored. This fine control allows the engine to be run very close to the knock limit without risk of engine damage.

Correction to dwell settings is required if the battery voltage falls, as a lower voltage supply to the coil will require a slightly larger dwell figure.

This information is often stored in the form of a

dwell correction map.

As the sophistication of systems has increased

the information held in the memory chips of the

ECU has also increased. The earlier versions of

programmed ignition system produced by Rover

achieved accuracy in ignition timing of 1.8°

whereas a conventional distributor is 8°. The

information, which is derived from dynamom-

eter tests as well as running tests in the vehicle, is stored in ROM. The basic timing map consists of the correct ignition advance for 16 engine speeds and 16 engine load conditions.

A separate three-dimensional map is used

which has eight speed and eight temperature

sites. This is used to add corrections for engine

coolant temperature to the basic timing settings.

This improves driveability and can be used to

decrease the warm-up time of the engine. The

data is also subjected to an additional load cor-

rection below 70°C. Figure 7.14 shows a flow

chart representing the logical selection of the

optimum ignition setting. Note that the ECU will

also make corrections to the dwell angle, both as a function of engine speed to provide constant energy output and due to changes in battery voltage. A lower battery voltage will require a slightly longer dwell and a higher voltage a slightly shorter dwell. A Windows® shareware program that simulates the ignition system (as well as many other systems) is available for download from my web site.

The output of a system such as this programmed ignition is very simple. The output stage, in common with most electronic ignition, consists of aheavy-duty transistor which forms part of, or is driven by, a Darlington pair. This is simply to allow the high ignition primary current to be controlled. The switch off point of the coil will control ignition timing and the switch on point will control the dwell period.

The high tension distribution is similar to a

more conventional system. The rotor arm, how-

ever, is mounted on the end of the camshaft with the distributor cap positioned over the top. 

7.15 shows a programmed ignition system.

Exhaust pressure analysis

 Exhaust pressure analysis

This solution involves using a pressure sensor in

exhaust manifold combined with a Fourier analysis as the first stage of the signal processing. Using a sensor to analyse the gas pulses in the exhaustanifold, it is possible to detect single misfires.

It is also possible to identify which cylinder is misfiring. This method is less intrusive than the above and could potentially be retrofitted at the production stage. A sensor in the exhaust can detect misfiring cylinders but cannot give useful, qualitative information about the combustion process. This technique has been demonstrated as capable of detecting all misfires at engine speeds up to 6000 rpm, for all engine configurations, loads, and fuels. Generally, a ceramic capacitive type sensor is been employed which has a short response time and good durability.

5.4.9 Testing vehicles for compliance

The manufacturer must demonstrate the correct function of the system to the appropriate authority.

For EOBD compliance this requires three com-

plete emission cycle runs (NEDC). This is known

as a demonstration test.

A faulty component is installed or simulated

which causes a violation of the emission limits;

two preconditioning cycles are run and then one

complete cycle to show that the error has been

recorded and highlighted via illumination of the

MIL. These phases are defined in EOBD legisla-

tion as:

● simulation of malfunction of a component of

the engine management or emission control

system;

● preconditioning of the vehicle with a simu-

lated malfunction;

● driving the vehicle with a simulated malfunc-

tion over the type 1 test cycle (NEDC) and

measuring the emissions of the vehicle;

● determining whether the OBD system reacts

to the simulated malfunction and indicates

malfunction in an appropriate manner to the

vehicle driver.

Typical failure modes induced to be detected are:

● Petrol/Gasoline Engines

– Replacement of the catalyst with a deteri-

orated or defective catalyst or electronic

simulation of such a failure

– Engine misfire conditions according to the

conditions for misfire monitoring given in

– Replacement of the oxygen sensor with a

deteriorated or defective oxygen sensor or

electronic simulation of such a failure

– Electrical disconnection of any other emis-

sion-related component connected to a pow-

ertrain management computer

– Electrical disconnection of the electronic

evaporative purge control device (if

equipped). For this specific failure mode,

the type 1 test must not be performed

● Diesel Engines

– Where fitted, replacement of the catalyst

with a deteriorated or defective catalyst or

electronic simulation of this condition

– Where fitted, total removal of the particu-

late trap or, where sensors are an integral

part of the trap, a defective trap assembly

– Electrical disconnection of any fuelling

system electronic fuel quantity and timing

actuator

– Electrical disconnection of any other emis-

sion related component connected to a power-

train management computer

Conditioning Run After Fault

Rectification

If an error has occurred with a component and

this error has been recorded by the OBD system,

then (after the problem has been rectified) it is

necessary to clear the fault code memory and test

or condition the vehicle to ensure that:

● the fault has really been fixed and does not

reoccur;

● the system is set up ready for correct future

detection of any faults.

This can be done by putting the vehicle through

drive cycle. A typical manufacturer defined drive

cycle would consist of the following.

1. A cold start (coolant temperature less than

50°C, coolant and air temp within 11°C of

each other).

2. Switch on ignition to allow oxygen sensor

heating and diagnostics.

3. Idle engine for 2 minutes with typical elect-

rical loads on (air conditioning and rear screen

heater).

4. Turn off loads and accelerate to cruise at 

half throttle. The OBD system will check for

misfire, fuel trim and EVAP (canister purge)

systems.

5. Hold speed steady at cruise for 3 minutes. The

OBD system monitors EGR, secondary air

system, oxygen sensors and EVAP system.

6. Overrun/coast down to low speed (i.e. 20 mph)

without using the brake or clutch. The OBD

systems check EGR and EVAP systems.

7. Accelerate back up to cruise for 5 minutes at

three quarter throttle. OBD checks misfire,

fuel trim and EVAP.

8. Hold steady speed of cruise for 5 minutes.

OBD monitors catalytic converter efficiency,

misfire, fuel trim, oxygen sensors and EVAP

systems.

9. Slow down to a stop without braking, OBD

checks EGR and EVAP.

The system is now fully reset and ready for detec-

tion of new faults. The necessary drive cycle to

guarantee reset of the whole system is manufac-

turer specific and should be checked appropriately.

Roadside test

An official in-service OBD2 emission test, as car-

ried out in the USA by inspectors from the regu-

latory authority, consists of the following three

parts (a likely European development therefore).

1. Check MIL function at ignition switch on.

2. Plug in OBD scanner, check monitor readi-

ness. If monitors are not all showing as ready,

the vehicle is rejected and further road testing

is to be done in order to activate all the readi-

ness flags. At this stage the scanner will also

download any fault codes that are present.

3. An additional test, scanner command illumin-

ation of MIL via ECU to verify the correct

function of the OBD system.


 Testing vehicles for 

compliance

The manufacturer must demonstrate the correct

function of the system to the appropriate authority.

For EOBD compliance this requires three com-

plete emission cycle runs (NEDC). This is known

as a demonstration test.

A faulty component is installed or simulated

which causes a violation of the emission limits;

two preconditioning cycles are run and then one

complete cycle to show that the error has been

recorded and highlighted via illumination of the

MIL. These phases are defined in EOBD legisla-

tion as:

● simulation of malfunction of a component of

the engine management or emission control

system;

● preconditioning of the vehicle with a simu-

lated malfunction;

● driving the vehicle with a simulated malfunc-

tion over the type 1 test cycle (NEDC) and

measuring the emissions of the vehicle;

● determining whether the OBD system reacts

to the simulated malfunction and indicates

malfunction in an appropriate manner to the

vehicle driver.

Typical failure modes induced to be detected are:

● Petrol/Gasoline Engines

– Replacement of the catalyst with a deteri-

orated or defective catalyst or electronic

simulation of such a failure

JET PUMP THEORY

 

RICHARD G. CUNNINGHAM

4.3

INTRODUCTION______________________________________________________

The jet pump transfers energy from a liquid or gas primary fluid to a secondary fluid.

The latter may be a liquid, a gas, a two-phase gas-in-liquid mixture, or solid particles transported in a gas or a liquid. Examples of all these combinations have been reported in the technical literature. Reference 1, the major bibliography in this field, contains over 400 abstracts. Although the terms “ejector” and “eductor” are also applied, the term "jet pump” will be used here. The jet pump offers significant advantages over mechanical pumps: no moving parts for improved reliability, adaptability to installation in remote or hazardous environments, simplicity, and low cost. The primary drawback is efficiency: both frictional losses and unavoidable mixing losses are incurred. Neverthe-less, careful design can produce pumps with efficiencies on the order of 30—40%. The jet pump in Figure 1 is typical of liquid-jet pumps and low Mach-number gas-jet/gas pumps.

Compressible-flow pumps, for example, steam-jet ejectors, employ converging-diverging nozzles for full expansion of the jet.

LIQUID-JET PUMP THEORY FOR THREE SECONDARY-FLOW TYPES _________

The liquid-jet pump model is based on conservation equations for energy, momentum, and mass. Real-fluid losses are accounted for by friction-loss coefficients (K). The primary or motive fluid is a liquid of density r1. In the following derivation, the secondary/pumped fluid can be a second liquid of density r1 or r2, or a gas-in-liquid bubbly mixture, or a gas. These

three jet pump flow regimes are referred to as liquid-jet liquid (LJL), liquid-jet gas liquid

(LJGL), and liquid-jet gas (LJG). Equations (1), (3), (5), and (7) below apply to all three.

Assumptions:

a. The primary and secondary streams enter the mixing throat with uniform velocity

distributions, and the mixed flows leave the throat and diffuser with a uniform velocity profile.

b. The gas phase—if present—undergoes isothermal compression in the throat and diffuser.

c. All two-phase flows at the throat entry and exit consist of homogeneous bubble mixtures of a gas in a continuous liquid.

d. Heat transfer from the gas to the liquid is negligible—the liquid temperature remains constant.

e. Change in solubility of the gas in the liquid from pressure Ps to Pd is negligible.

f. Vapor evolution from and condensation to the liquid are negligibly small.